2014/11/07

Please improve OneDrive!


Intro…


Ok, for the last several days I’ve been “playing” with OneDrive ( https://onedrive.live.com/ ), and yesterday I went to post a suggestion to MS to this link here ( http://helps.ms/KLMgHC ) , as advised by OneDrive support on Twitter ( https://twitter.com/onedrive/status/529975792093388800 ). But since they accept only 1000 characters and after 15 minutes I wrote ~5000 (figures) I’ve decided to clean up a lot of dust from my old blog ( http://itflame.blogspot.com/ ), and add a new post. I’ll send link to this page to Microsoft through their support web form, and hopefully they’ll read. I’ll send it to their Twitter ( https://twitter.com/onedrive ) as well, just in case, and will post it to windows.uservoice.com suggestion box for Windows 10 ( https://windows.uservoice.com/forums/265757-windows-feature-suggestions ), and anywhere else I figure it could reach the right people. But since I’m now on a blog and have unlimited space, let’s expand on those 5000 characters.

Before OneDrive


I’m and IT guy, and a geek, a tech enthusiast, and really love new stuff. I’m also living in a country where paychecks arrive sometimes, and sometimes not, and 80% of country lives from paycheck to paycheck. I’m a lucky one, I can afford few extras from time to time. So I’ve been looking at cloud storage for 2 years or maybe more, waiting for it to become good enough and cheap enough for both what I need and what I can afford. I have a HD video camera (Panasonic HDC-TM700) and a huge 3+ TB video collection from it. Add some pictures, music, personal documents, numbers continue to rise. To be straight, I have some 10TB storage space in total at my home, large part of it is backup of my video & pictures archive (so just duplicates really), and then a bunch of  downloadable stuff (like OS files, and Steam library and such), but this still ends up at 4.5-5TB of personal data. So I needed a huge cloud, and a cheap one. The day came last week when OneDrive published they are going for unlimited storage for Office 365 subscribers, including Home (personal) subscriptions ( http://blogs.office.com/2014/10/27/onedrive-now-unlimited-storage-office-365-subscribers/ ). I was looking for a good deal for a day or two, and finally bought a yearly subscription, and went ahead to test it.

Now I just have to upload, right?


Wrong! First of all, I have a lousy <1Mbps upload at home. Download speed is just fine, 20Mbps, but up is slow. I just got an offer for 100/20 link, but I figured I could use other ways around a problem for the time being, and decided to use my company’s resources since it has 2 links, each 100/100, and 90% of time 90% of bandwidth of both links stands there doing nothing. So I figured ok, I’ll limit it to like 50%, and since I’m in IT I can always see if total link is nearing limits so I can pause my uploads. And thus on Monday I went with 2TB external drive to my office…

Next step – how to upload. Correct answer should be using the OneDrive app, correct? Wrong! Well, not that I haven’t tried it, I did. First you have to copy all files to OneDrive folder, meaning I would have to do it in chunks because my PC in office does not have 2TB of free space in folder that Microsoft designated as “OneDrive folder”. Not to do it all for nothing, I took just one file as a test. But it took 2 minutes just to “prepare” this single 4GB video chunk, and only then started uploading! And even then – speed was dismal. I was waiting for 10 minutes to see 1%. Then I’ve canceled it. See, my first attempt was actually through web browser, and speed there was slow, but still faster than a built-in client. How is this possible! You have a dedicated app, built into OS itself, has access to whatever Microsoft allows it, and – simple web browser upload beat it. Yawn… Besides, app did not allow me to login to different MS account from one linked to that PC (see below), and did not have bandwidth management of any kind, so it actually had nothing to offer vs web. Speed – slow. Upload from one fixed location. No management. No dual / alternate account login. So I moved on quickly.

OK, like already mentioned, I’ve gone through the web first. It allows for a login to any account (mostly), and you could upload files from anywhere, even from external drive if you wanted to. There I’ve had several other issues. First was – if you’re connected to your Live / Microsoft account in Windows, which is a recommended setup by Microsoft (for Windows 8 and up), you get auto-logged in to Microsoft services on web. Fine. But my business PC uses one MS account, and I personally use a whole different account (one where I’ve subscribed to Office 365). Sure, you can log-off, and login? Right? Well, most of time. But whenever you close a window or open a new one, you’ll get your default account linked to PC username currently in use. Also, IE does not support folder uploads to OneDrive, so I went to Google Chrome which is the only browser at the moment that works with folder uploads. Logged in, drag & drop, and behold – uploads like crazy! Well, it created folders and transferred small files like crazy, but once was introduced to 4GB video chunks (camera auto-splits files at 3.99GB) it went to a stead 7-9Mbps. Not bad for mere mortals, but I have 100/100 link at my disposal, and this is not nearly the bandwidth expected. Test of the link confirmed – I have full 100Mbps upload available. Checking the PC HDD showed no slowdowns, so it’s not the reason. Oh, and to answer some questions forming in your heads – I did not upload directly from external USB, I’ve transferred 250GB of files to HDD just for this reason, wanted to make sure I’ll get best speed possible from my hardware / infrastructure. So I started playing with different browsers and such, and soon found out you get about 8Mbps x multiple browsers. To a limit it works with single browser in multiple windows, but Chrome peaked at some 18Mbps, so let’s say 2 x 8Mbps. Adding Firefox and IE in parallel got me to 25Mbps with bursts up to 30Mbps. Much better! But now I had 10+ browser windows/tabs opened in 3 different browsers, and my CPU and RAM were going through the roof, and I was still limited to <30Mbps. This setup lasted a full day, but after that I had another set of problems. Many folders timed out, or browsers got stuck, and so on, so I ended with a lot of half-uploaded folders, and folders with 0-byte files etc. I had to check them all manually, and then re-upload as needed. This took another chunk of my time. I ended up doing the following dance after that: drag & drop all folders through Chrome, then wait a few minutes for it to create all folders, and then cancel those folders that contain big MTS video files and let it move on with uploading rest of small files (as usual in AVCHD structure). Once Chrome creates all folders and finishes with smaller files, open few browser windows (you can use multiple browsers and multiple tabs), and then drag & drop just these large MTS files to where they belong. I keep one tab per folder, as this allows you to check each folder on its own, you get a few times better upload speeds than in just single tab/browser, and if one folder fails with uploads for any reason others continue to upload. A lot of manual management though, and you have to be near PC most of the time and check it at least 2x an hour so you don’t end up with stuck failed uploads waiting for you to click… well… “Retry” button.

I had one more idea, but it failed miserably. Sure, it’s not supported by Microsoft, so can’t blame them for it. But first off I thought maybe MS has FTP as an option. No. Box has it ( https://support.box.com/hc/communities/public/questions/200261028-Does-Box-support-FTP-or-WebDAV- ), OneDrive not. +1 for competitor. Then I saw people speaking about WebDAV and mapping network drives, Box officially supports it, MS acts as it does not exist. +1 for competitor again. But it actually kind of worked. There are tutorials on the web how to do it, even on MSDN ( http://blogs.msdn.com/b/robert_mcmurray/archive/2014/09/30/using-the-webdav-redirector-with-onedrive-part-1-standard-security.aspx ) ! But don’t bother. It’s slow, and unreliable. Some files get uploaded but then suddenly disappear (?!). Some stay. Some are just 0-byte files. And browsing through folders is really slow, ranges about 5-10 seconds per click. There are some bonuses, like you can actually right click folder and check Properties in File Explorer to see if all your files are in it and if size is same as your original copy. But that’s it mostly, everything else is just easier and safer through web. Since it is unsupported “backdoor” of sorts, you can’t bother Microsoft with it, so I gave up. Cute thing, if done properly it would revolutionize OneDrive for at least some techy people, but this way it’s best you take Microsoft’s word for it and act as if it’s not there.

Other people’s experiences


Since I’m like that, nosy and all, I was looking what other people said. I’ve found a bunch of people with same problems, and no solutions. And these include people like Paul Thurrot from http://winsupersite.com/ ( http://winsupersite.com/onedrive/so-whats-it-pushing-all-your-data-onedrive  &  http://winsupersite.com/onedrive/onedrive-data-dump-part-2-photos ) and Lowell Heddings ( https://twitter.com/howtogeek/status/527282081421070336 ) from How-to Geek ( http://www.howtogeek.com/author/thegeek/ ). They wonder the same thing. People commenting to their posts, tweets and article wonder the same. And web is full of comments like these.

My message to support


OK, so to get back to a 5000+ character message I wrote to OneDrive support… here it is, with some more details and some emotional questions. Since it failed to be sent through the 1000 character limit here it is in its whole:

Why are uploads so slow on personal OneDrive? I've been uploading 250GB for 3 full days now, and still unfinished - on a 100/100 optical fiber! There are no restrictions from ISP. So facts: 250GB data, mostly MTS files (home videos) up to 3.99GB in size; 100/100 optics, tested, works great on other services; Speedtest.net and similar bandwidth tests show 95+ up/down; on OneDrive client (built-in, Win 10) - very slow; on web it's faster than client, but still around 8Mbps for a single session; with several browsers and multiple windows / sessions I get to around 25Mbps through web, but that's in 3 browsers and in about 10 windows!! Thing is... I have close to 3TB of these videos, with current speed it will take me 40-45 days (if I'm lucky), and with a lot of manual work (web isn't very reliable for 4GB files, so sometimes I have to retry, or do it again manually, have to check each folder after upload if it really uploaded, etc. etc.). This is all direct opposite of what I’ve expected. I though I'll just drag my files to OneDrive folder, and with 100/100 link I'll be done in 4-5 days... Obviously not. I know it's hard to give everyone 100% speed, but why just 10% of speed that I we achieve? I've counted on let's say 60-70% of top achievable speed, but this is really around 8-9% at the moment if I look at the average speed during last few days. Please fix it! Please make client way faster, please allow us 100% speed, even if only for a few days (initial upload of files). Oh right, this is on Office 365 Home subscription, so 1TB currently, going for unlimited. But what's with unlimited if I need to spend 40-45 days to upload my data :-( Also, support isn't helpful, they just keep redirecting me and others to "maximize your speeds" link ( like this: https://twitter.com/onedrive/status/529639159942873090 ) as if we're dumb and haven't tried all of it already ( support link: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/onedrive/upload-download-speed ). Also, you can read comments a little, almost everyone have these upload speeds (if their ISP is at or over 10Mbps), everyone get to about 50-70 gigabytes of data in one day, which means a lot of time for data that we’ve accumulated with our digital pictures and videos. Please please please! Listen to customers, improve speeds! New OneDrive improved speeds by your words and blogs ( https://blog.onedrive.com/onedrive-now-supports-10-gb-files/ ), but is still far away from what can be done! How can web upload to OneDrive be faster than dedicated client, makes no sense! Also, we'd all love to be able to access OneDrive through normal tools (like FTP client perhaps?), tools that are proven to work, that can push tens of megabits per second without issues, tools that know how to resume uploads, tools that won't duplicate your files, tools that can upload from any disk/folder and not just from one folder. OneDrive tries all of these things - but fails all. Speeds are slow in both client and web. Client will resume uploads, but web won't, but since client is so much slower than web it's useless, I'll rather upload few files twice (due to connection errors on web etc.) than wait for all uploads forever to finish through client. Client only uploads from its own folder, web can upload from any but in that case connection errors will slow you down, you have to juggle with several windows opened, can't restart PC (or all uploads will fail), etc. So you have 2 major ways to upload from PC, and one has few perks, other has other few perks, but neither is really good, and both are far from perfect. This is all weird since I haven't had such issues with much older tools and from much smaller companies than Microsoft. I can't get my head around the fact that the largest software company in the word is doing this so badly, with software so half-baked, lacking features, and so on. I'm not saying that OneDrive as a service is BAD, it's fine for an average user, and it’s all easily fixable. Just make a better Windows client. Web is currently great as a quick way to upload some files or access them remotely, it shouldn’t be a tool for 50GB uploads, and it's not Microsoft's fault if it’s not perfect experience (timeouts happen, browsers break, etc.). But Windows OS client has to be solid as a rock. Not a rock, a mountain. It has to have bandwidth management (especially if built in OS as it is), allowing other services to use the network, but if idle using 100% of capacity to sync. It has to allow for manual settings, so we can limit bandwidth in app (look at any FTP client or P2P client). It has to be error resilient even if you point it to a 2TB folder. While at that, it has to allow us to upload from any and all folders. Just as you add files to Library in Windows, you should be able to add any folder to "OneDrive Library", which will trigger a sync. It has to allow us to pick a per file/folder settings if we want files to sync one way or two ways, if we want files to stay on OneDrive even if they are deleted (perhaps by mistake) on PC or not. I know we can currently pick folders as "online only" or "available offline", step in right direction, but it can be done even better with more granularity. Easy way to just right click any folder and say "sync to OneDrive" is one small but important feature people will hail to. And there are many more. See what your competitors do, copy it all, see what people say about OneDrive on uservoice.com inside Windows 10 TP opinion box ( https://windows.uservoice.com/search?filter=merged&query=onedrive ), there are awesome things suggested. Etc. etc. But first and most important - make it usable. If it is slow service and unreliable, and we can't even get your first sync easily to the cloud... than no one will use it. You know, the first experience and how much it matters? Once you make that happen, add the features, make it strong. Thanks!

Suggestion box aggregated


Not to be lazy, and to help OneDrive team, I even took some time after writing everything above, and went through different forums and comments which I’ve read looking for different solutions, and gathered them all in one place for an ultimate wish list. Not to keep you waiting any further (after 16k characters, right ;) ), here it is!

Edit (2014-11-08): Added links to onedrive.uservoice.com where I could find them. Added few more good suggestions to my list below.

Ultimate OneDrive Wish List


-          Make dedicated onedrive.uservoice.com forum so people can add more suggestions! (Edit 2014-11-07: found! http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive )

-          Add FTP support

-          Add WebDAV / “Map network drive” support (official), and make it so it supports all characters supported by Windows file system, as currently some characters, even ones like comma or hash get replaced


-          Make a web upload sturdier, allowing for “auto-retry” on a failed upload

-          Allow OneDrive to be completely disabled and uninstalled even on Windows 8.1 / Windows 10

-          Remove high differences in subscriptions between countries, no country has 100% tax to justify the doubling of prices (10 EUR vs 8 GBP vs 8 USD vs …)

-          Remove clauses regarding forbidden content for private folders (not shared), or at least make it more exact, people shouldn’t be banned for having a nude photo of their newborn child, or their own nude from vacation! This is still a problem, even though this article is from 2012. This is – private – data! http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyclay/2012/07/19/is-microsoft-spying-on-skydrive-users/

-          Add deduplication to OneDrive clients, so files don’t get uploaded twice, should work even if 3rd party uploaded the file before (e.g. freeware app, or copy-left picture, movies from public domain, etc.)

-          Differential sync / upload, goes with deduplication hand in hand, so again, doesn't matter if the file was uploaded by us or 3rd party, if upload can be smaller using deduplication + differential sync, than do it ( http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6369855-enable-differential-sync-only-sync-parts-of-the )


-          Remove the artificial limitation on web uploads (for me personally around 8 Mbps per session, as above)

-          Add bandwidth management in all apps – should allow for manual setup of upload/download speeds, daily & monthly data caps, exclusion of metered networks, or exclusion of manually selected network, schedulers for time of day/week, etc. (partial: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6379913-option-to-limit-sync-speed )

-          Upload from any folder, without moving files. Add right click + upload to OneDrive. Add right click + sync with OneDrive (permanent sync). Add option to OneDrive in My Computer on Windows to be managed as a Library (simply adding more folders that we want to sync, even from another partition / drive) (link: https://windows.uservoice.com/forums/265757-windows-feature-suggestions/suggestions/6565105-tag-folders-for-inclusion-in-onedrive-syncing ; DECLINED link, post comments to reopen!: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6332340-allow-any-folder-to-be-synced )

-          Notify us when file changes, show list of recently changed files (new, deleted or modified), similar to request below, should work together (link: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6677605-provide-rss-notification-on-changes-made-to-onedri & http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6329227-allow-users-to-subscribe-to-notifications-on-a-sha )

-          Give us a history feed of sorts, so we can see recent changes (files added, deleted, modified, when, by whom, etc.), without going from file to file, sort of a revision tool to easily check what’s going on (more or less same as above, so I'll put in same link, even though notifications and a feed is not the same, though they work hand in hand: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6677605-provide-rss-notification-on-changes-made-to-onedri )
-          Add screenshots to cloud (make OneDrive a screenshot tool, like Dropbox) (link, in progress: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6376759-onedrive-capture-tool-and-quick-share-features )

-          Allow granular sharing control and management, adding some users as read only, some as read/write, some with delete ability, and some with modify but not delete, etc. (link: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6677590-ntfs-like-permissions-on-shares-full-control-mod )

-          Show files that others shared with us (like advanced shortcuts/bookmarks, similar to the shared view on the web; link: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6328728-add-shared-shared-with-me-view-to-the-modern ), allow us to copy them to our own storage pool for easy access and sync to PC (skipping the need for manual download & re-upload, saving time and bandwidth; link:  http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6536198-make-shared-by-others-better )


-          Support for logoff and login as person that is not logged to that PC with “connected account”, so either using local account connected to Live account but using another Microsoft account to access OneDrive, or using OneDrive with “ordinary” local account (not the connected one) (link: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6409926-allow-local-accounts-full-use-of-desktop-and-moder )

-          Improve the “properties” feature on web so it can show more details for folders, like file properties in an OS (number of files and subfolders in a folder, total size, etc.). Maybe even get the same info if you select multiple files/folders and want to get their total size/numbers.

-          Option for auto-retry of failed web uploads, so it can be used in an un-attended mode, plus an upload resume ( partial: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6650116-upload-resumption-in-web-interface )

-          Allow us to lock folders “read only” on the web and in the client, thus protecting the online copy from accidental modifications, deleting, attacks of malware or crypto lockers etc. (partial, similar to: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6601662-mark-files-as-can-not-be-deleted )

-          Add versioning of all online files, at least in limited ways ( http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6327142-enable-file-versioning-history-for-all-types-of-fi )

-          Improve handling of multimedia online. For example, mp4v, mp4 and m4v aren’t handled the same online even though they are essentially same container and file type. Also, when user uploads large videos, make a background recoding to a stream friendly formats, and for example recode 1080/60p M2TS video to lower bitrate mp4 in 1080p/720p/480p. Allow us automatic and manual choice of streaming of these lower bandwidth videos. Allow us to share these original videos, but give everyone a choice if they’ll download original file or recoded one. Make those recoded videos available for streaming through OneDrive app. Make them available for streaming in video players, like Modern Video app in Win 8/10, show them in Windows Media Player library for streaming directly from cloud, etc. Do similar for pictures and audio formats, integrate them in audio / video players and picture galleries. Ok, pictures are already supported very well, but can be improved with better management, better meta tag support, etc. (this is like 10+ requests in one, for details search http://onedrive.uservoice.com/ )

-          Add clear “online” and “offline” icons to files and folders, otherwise how should we know if these are set to always online/offline without clicking each and every one and checking properties ( http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6399236-icons-overlay-and-other-visual-help-needed )


-          Remove limits of number of files syncing, makes sense with unlimited data service ( http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6392647-remove-the-limit-20-000-of-files-that-can-be-sto )

-          Remove limits to folder and file name size/length/depth, should be equal to Windows NTFS capabilities so we can mirror our file/folder trees and organization to cloud undisturbed ( http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6325774-enable-long-file-paths-aka-file-name-too-long-p?page=2&per_page=20 )

-          Allow us local data encryption of selected files/folders, before these leave our device. Also, allow transparent decryption if used through this same client from cloud (or just ask for password before opening those files). Do NOT make this the same password as it is for our Microsoft/live account with which we login to OneDrive. (links: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6423983-encrypt-from-local-device-files-to-onedrive-would & http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6423969-onedrive-bitlocker-encript-feature-secure-share )

-          Make OneDrive default viewer for files that can be opened with online tools (Office Online and such), if there is no other app installed on the PC. When being opened warn that it will upload file to web so it can be opened there. This can also be just read only access (open, view, print) if person is not Office 365 subscriber or similar. ( https://windows.uservoice.com/forums/265757-windows-feature-suggestions/suggestions/6542406-open-office-files-with-onedrive-if-office-is-not-i )

-          Make a sync filter by whitelisting/blacklisting extensions (for example, allow all jpegs, disallow all dlls and exe files, partial suggestion link: https://windows.uservoice.com/forums/265757-windows-feature-suggestions/suggestions/6576168-onedrive-extend-sync-options )

-          When syncing don’t get sidetracked by files that have sync errors, continue without them and warn user that OneDrive needs attention (maybe this had been implemented, I haven’t had these issues so far) (not exact, but here anyway: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6571001-make-upload-reliable )

-          Show better status of OneDrive in both web and apps, but specially Windows app. It should show current sync status, if it’s currently uploading it should say how much is uploaded, how much is left, how far it went, which files are being uploaded at the moment, which files are waiting for sync etc. If it is not uploading it should state if it’s 100% synced, or if it is offline, or if it has sync issues and so on.


-          “Smart sync” or “LAN sync” should be a part of all apps, even smartphone/tablet apps, on all platforms. It should function like a small P2P network, so if multiple devices in same network are sharing same files/folders these should sync in LAN and not through web. Upload/download once in a network, and not once for each device. Dropbox has something like this, and some P2P sync tools as well. It should also allow limited OneDrive functions without cloud, for example if home server has 2TB of files “always offline”, and client PCs are setup as “online-only”, if this location has no Internet access (technical reasons and such), OneDrive apps on server and PCs should talk to each other’s and if one of “online-only devices” requests a file from Cloud and it is available on another PC or home server, it should be able to get it from there. It will increase speeds, and will allow more users to use the services without overloading Microsoft’s infrastructure. (partial: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6327930-syncing-over-lan )

-          If device opens an “online only” file, it should be cached locally. There should be a user configurable amount of such cache. So maybe I’ll put all files as “online only” but will allow for 200GB cache, and files I use the most often or use them recently will be available for me. Smart checking if cached version is the latest one is to be assumed if device is connected to Internet. ( this is a partial: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6475534-offline-access-on-android )

-          Ability to detach / block certain device through web interface in case of theft or if it is lost. Also, add ability to delete all OneDrive files from that device remotely (remote wipe) (link #1: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6421416-remote-wipe ; #2: https://windows.uservoice.com/forums/265757-windows-feature-suggestions/suggestions/6602868-initiate-remote-wipe-erase-if-laptop-tablet )

-          (added 2011-11-08) Remove file size limit ( http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6421614-allow-files-of-any-size-to-be-synced )

-          (added 2011-11-08) URL "fetch" ability, so we can enter URL of an online file in the upload box (in apps and on web), and file would be downloaded directly to OneDrive, instead of downloading to PC and than uploading to OneDrive (like this: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6642190-let-onedrive-fetch-files-for-me , and this: http://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/6484366-give-a-feature-to-import-data-from-other-cloud-sto )

I’ve probably skipped some, but like I’ve wrote before – check forums, and uservoice.com. (EDIT: I'll be adding updates to the above list, either new suggestions that I find or think of, or if status of above suggestion changes.)

Good news for the end…


Well, since I’ve been writing this one and off for a whole day, I got an early present in meantime. My OneDrive now shows 10TB. Thank you Microsoft! This is a very nice service and worth every penny in my opinion, but we just want it to be awesome as it deserves. Most of this just needs some smart programming. Some of it will even make OneDrive cheaper for Microsoft to support as it will lessen load on its infrastructure. Only small part of it needs serious investments. So pick the “cheap” suggestions first, I won’t mind. Just keep improving this service :)

Comments?


Do you have comments? Other suggestions? I made a mistake and something can already be done or was already fixed? Anything at all to add? Please comment below! Or contact me… just google me, you’ll find me ;) And thanks for reading this monster post! :)

EDIT 2015-11-04:
Microsoft just made me give up from OneDrive. For more information please see official blog post here: https://blog.onedrive.com/onedrive_changes/
Here is my new blog post on this subject: http://itflame.blogspot.hr/2015/11/give-us-back-our-storage-onedrive.html
And people's (and mine) reactions on official Uservoice forum are here, currently top rated and hottest post ever on OneDrive Uservoice forums:
https://onedrive.uservoice.com/forums/262982-onedrive/suggestions/10524099-give-us-back-our-storage

2008/05/23

Perfect portable PC

Here I am, blooging again, after an article on Tom's Daily made old dreams come back ;)

Let's neglect the above article, as you can read it (and my comment) later :P ;)

What's my "dream" portable? Here is the short list:
- has to be easily portable (dooh!)
- has to be usefull (dooh! ^2)

Ok, now for the long list, as above doesn't give too much info.. I'll mostly list same things here that I had have listed several years ago, just with updated components. Meaning it has to:
- be powerfull enough to run any modern OS;Vista excluded for now - Win XP, Linux, OS X, any of them
- for that it has to have x86 CPU, and the more powerfull the better (Intel Atom or VIA Isaiah would be nice)
- ofcourse this same CPU has to be low-powered 'cos there isn't space for huge batteries or cooling systems, hence Atom/Isaiah preference
- further on it has to have at least 2GB of DDR2 RAM (800MHz preferably)
- big storage is a must, and we're talking at LEAST 40GB disk at a very minimum, but the bigger the better, anything over this value that can be cost-effective and power-effective at the same time (SSD is out cos of price, flash cards 'cos of storage space)
- usual suspects for I/O have to be included meaning several USB 2.0 ports (4 would be perfect, 2 for optional mouse/keyboard, one for external drive, and one free for "other"), Gigabit Ethernet, DVI (integrated video of any sort as long as it can run video and OS just fine) and audio out
- wireless I/O should be well supported by Bluetooth, WiFi and even IR if there is space
- speakers of any sort except mono, and an integrated microphone ofcourse
- and on top of all the hardware - touch screen with as much pixels per inch, and as much inches without getting too big to stick in the large pocket or a briefcase/backpack/purse/whatever-you-use-to.carry-stuff-around
- battery which can endure at least 2 consecutive full-length movies, meaning 3h of full-throttle usage

Now above listed things are bare minimum, but on top of that, I'd like to see some cheapo and not-so-cheapo additions. "Cheap" part would be these:
- add a nice "higher" quality camera (don't give me 0.3 Mpix camera, if my 2-year-old-back-than-50$ cell phone had better!); should be at least 2.0 Mpix
- FM radio would be real nice, as even cheapest MP3 players have it, so it can't be expensive or complicated to implement - and please not through proprietary headphones (like in some cells), I want to use any speaker or headphones for listening!
- soft carry-bag, to protect from scratches and not adding much weight/size to the package

And a several "advanced options", even if not all models would have all of these:
- bundeled external DVD writer, or at least as a VALUE-added option (value means that it should be cheaper than me going to the store and buying burner plus an external case!)
- those multitouch functions from iPhone sound just nice (pinching, zooming, rotating and stuff like that)
- projected keyboard - to save space, but add functionality at the same time
- intergrated space for SIM-card and mobile phone functionality, including 3G+ connectivity would be great option, unless you can bundle a cheap phone with it :)

Now, if you can make all of the above, minus advanced stuff, for let's say 500$? I think it can be done, although I don't have a source for all the prices here are my "best guesses":
- 49€ Atom CPU + board (80$)
- 40$ for 80GB 2.5" HDD
- 45$ for 2x 1GB SODIMM DDR2
- 200$ for LCD and chasis (I threw this number from nowhere to say the truth, but I think it's more than enough)
- 5$ for integrated speakers, 5$ for FM, 5$ for bag (I gave more than enough space here ;P )
- 20$ for Bluetooth/IR
- 25$ for power adapter
- 40$ battery
-- rough total
465$

So - going under 500$ is attainable for this device, and you have enough space to earn some money if you sell it for 499$.
For extra 100-150$ I think you could have all the "advanced" stuff in it as well, together with a more powerfull battery to endure all of that.

To tell the truth, it is still pricey in my book, but when I see phones selling for the same price, this would indeed be CHEAP. As nothing can measure with using your favourite desktop apps on the move, and not having to lugg around a laptop..

Am I living in a fantasy world? Please, do comment..

As for a remainder of my thoughts about this device, please check back later today or tomorrow, as I intend to illustrate a week of life using such portable PC, and what could you do with it, that you usualy do in other ways right now ;)

2008/01/11

More roadmap thoughts?

Since we're already on next-gen graphics, here are my thoughts on some data posted around last week on HardOCP. Some of these are already confirmed by some news on HardOCP and Fudzilla, just like it's starting to leak all over the web as well :)

EDIT (Jan 17th): Updated few things (where font is different :) )

EDIT (Mar 24th): Updated with closing thoughts/facts and closed the article (at the end)

So to sum up the things a bit..
9800 GX2 looks to be SLI of 8800 GTS cards (2x 65nm GPUs, 2x512=1GB, 2x128 stream units=256). Quoted "at least" 30% over 8800 Ultra could be fine with this, though number is a bit low so maybe they'll be a bit lower clocked compared to 8800 GTS

Next in the speed bin is 9800 GTX. They say it's slower than GX2 (ofcourse), and should be faster than 8800GT/GTS. So we're either looking at only renamed 8800GTX-> 9800GTX, specially since this is the only one of the new cards that sports triple-SLI, or at best it's a bit overclocked 8800GTS. Let's face it, if GX2 is 30% over Ultra, and current 8800GTS is pretty close, this one won't be much improved version (so you can forget 512bit memory controlers, maybe just 100-200MHz memory speed bump at most!)

Next in line is 9800GT. No info at all.. Fishy isn't it? By the looks of the above two cards, things are even too fishy, and 8800GT->9800GT renaming pops to my mind. I mean, face reality. 8800GT 512, 8800GTS 512, 8800GTX and 8800Ultra are all in some 10-15% range. Once added 9800GTS, and 9800GT do you really think anything more can be expected? Even if we're looking at 40% difference in performance across range, it's hard to expect much from THIS nVidia.

And so we're left with either 8800GT/GTS being tweaked and renamed to 9800GT/GTX (and quickly pulled from the shelves in current form) or JUST being renamed..

And than we have 9600GT which is already going to the lower end, possibly replacing 8800GT 256MB. New PCB design could just as well be explained by the news that nVidia is "suggesting" to partners to lower number of PCB layers to cheapen the cards making it more competitive to HD38xx cards. (later in few articles it was confirmed that this card looks a lot like 8800GT, same cooling and all. Performance will be similar to 8800GS, maybe bit lower, and a bit better than ATi's 3850 with 256MB of memory. Quoted specs seem to be 650MHz for the GPU, with the 512MB of 256-bit GDDR3 memory at 1,800MHz and the Shaders at 1,625MHz.Also, seems that it's not G92 but cut-down version called G94 which is much smaller in size, meaning less costs for all, right?)

I won't even bother with 8800GS, since I think it's not even shrink, I'd say they are selling off old G80 inventory and possibly old stock of GPUs with smaller errors where they can still use them if they disable few units and underclock them (memory configs speak in that direction). (cards started to appear, 384MB DDR3 at 700MHz, 580MHz core, shaders at 1450, 192bit mem interface, 96 stream processors. Of course, clocks can and will be higher for OCed versions)

My bet would be:
9800 GX2 = 2x 8800GTS
9800 GTX = a bit tweaked 8800GTS 512MB (with possibly 1GB comming later)
9800 GT = more or less renamed 8800GT 512MB, maybe few Mhz boost
9600 GT = bit lower/higher clocked 8800GT 256MB, depending on HD3850 pricing/sales EDIT: coupled with cheaper production boards ofcourse :P
8800 GT/GTS EOL in all versions currently available as soon as 9800's are out
8800 GS EOL in 2 months after they sell those old G80 GPUs
8600 GTS and lower cards will hopefully stay the same cards as they are :P

EDIT: There are also 9500 cards on the go, but that will be just for non-gaming folks probably..

Closing thoughts (Mar 24th): So here we are, April is near, and it had been confirmed in several ways. 9800 GX2 is released, and it is indeed not much more than 2x 8800GTS with just a bit different clocks. 9800 GTX should be out on 1st, and is same as GTS, just with 25MHz higher core clocks, higher memory clocks (1100MHz is current info), and tri-sli connectors. Since we had 1GB GTS cards coming out lately, 9800 GTX will too, just not the first day - so far only 512MB. 9800GT is close to release as well, and since GTX wasn't upped a lot from 8800 GTS, this card can't go much higher either. So count at more memory/core clocks, and possibly tri-sli connector, but even this wasn't confirmed. 9600GT is out now for a while, it did get a "new" chip, but it was just lower-cost G92 version. Big change that came with 9600GT was huge improvements to SLI performance, GX2 followed, so everyone expects that nVidia included same tweaks to new chips for 9800 GT/GTX. As the end, all the 8xxx will be EOL soon. So I didn't miss much with my mid-January predictions.

And at the end - who profits the most with this new 9xxx lineup refresh? First let's agree - lower-midrange through 9600GT which is a stellar card, especially as an upgrade option in future (SLI). And second, and foremost - any SLI user of these new cards. SLI had been improved in lots of ways: through tweaks inside chips and cards, driver updates, Vista patches, game patches... So here we have a bright future for SLI. I won't say bright for GX2 card, even though it looks nice in the end, but ordinary multi-card SLI setups will be more used in future obviously, and these tweaks/patches/updates will benefit all, not just high-end users as it was thus far (see 9600GT SLI reviews).

So this is it, I conclude this article, and will do the same with "graphics roadmap" article, even though that one is never-ending-story; of course ;) But you can check it out as well :)

Top graphics roadmap - Fudzilla.com

Ok, I've only took data from dozen of news that appeared during last few days on Fudzilla.com and "compiled" them in one easier-to-read article. I hope you'll enjoy it more in this way ;)

EDIT (Jan 15th): I've decided to keep this one updated for next few weeks until situation gets clear finally :)
EDIT (Feb 9th): Cleaned up and rearranged a bit, hopefully it's easier to read now ;) You've got 5 sections now, I've added Crossfire as some mighty interesting news are popping up, so start reading :P
EDIT (Feb 12th): Section 6 added - ATi RV740 for mainstream coming in Q3. More below!
EDIT (March 24th): Closing the article with a few final words in each "unfinished" section, as I won't be updating this article anymore, as most of things are already done-and-out. Same is applied to nVidia's roadmap article over here. Once there is more news, I'll probably open new articles dedicated to RV7xx and GT200 cards, but won't go this wide in same article..

Crossfire/CrossfireX

Recent news about new Crossfire drivers (Catalyst 8.x) and upcoming  CrossfireX drivers are getting interesting.
First off, we have an interview telling us about expected performance in CrossfireX. It's interesting, but not as much as next info that came in!
As of Catalyst 8.1, you can mix 38xx cards in different configurations, and it had been tested and confirmed! So far, it's been confirmed and benchmarked with a mix of 3870/3850 cards, which had different memory sizes, and clocks. And it seems that it works, since 2x3850 is slower than 3870/512MB+3850/256MB which is again slower than 3870/512MB+3850/1GB. Of course, 2x 3870/512MB is fastest combo, but in a few situations it looks like extra memory in 512+1GB configuration helps to beat it even though 3850/1GB has a bit less raw processing power. Interesting indeed! And with CrossfireX which supports more than 2 GPUs, you should be able to mix 3870X2 with these cards as well!
What else can we expect? I don't know, but this is first time that I got hooked up to multi-card scenario, as buying 3850 now can be a good thing, since later on you can even add 3870 X2 and still get extra performance from your "good old 3850". Only thing to see now, is - will we be able to mix cards that are even more different? I'm talking about both 36xx+38xx and 3xxx+R700 family.
Any way you turn it - cheers to AMD/ATi teams! They've done a huge thing!
Btw, just a side note, Tomshardware tested PCIe 1.x vs 2.0, and what kind of effect 4x/8x/16x slots have on current cards. And while in early days you couldn't spot any difference between these, and even AGP was pretty close, those numbers suggest that you should stick it to dual 16x slots if you intend to do Crossfire/SLI. PCIe 2.0 doesn't do much at the moment (~2% advantage), but we're talking about R700/GT200 coming soon, and the difference will increase with time. So if you're building new rig, get yourself a 2x 16x PCIe 2.0 motherboard like Intel's X38/X48, and AMD's or nVidia's higher end 700-series (beware here, they both sometimes mix 2.0 and 1.1, just as 16x/8x slots, and it all depends on versions used and how was certain motherboard made, so check MBO specifications before buying!)

EDIT (March 24th): New CrossFireX driver is out, so go and see the results, there are lots of them on the web :)

  • CrossFireX and DirectX 9 and 10 scaling - interview part 1 (UPDATE Feb 7th)
  • CrossfireX and future of High end - interview part 2 (UPDATE Feb 7th
  • You can mix 3870 and 3850 in Crossfire (UPDATE Feb 7th)
  • CrossfireX can mix 3870X2, 3870 and 3850 (UPDATE Feb 9th)
  • HD3870 and HD3850 mix tested in Crossfire (UPDATE Feb 9th)


    AMD (ATi) Radeon HD 3870 X2

    A Taiwanese forum has scored the first pictures of the Radeon HD 3870 X2 in the nude, as well as the first benchmark figure ever, although at first look 9,573 doesn't look that great in 3DMark 06. However, the test was not run at standard settings, but rather at 2,560x1,600 and the CPU was a Core 2 Duo E6600 at stock clocks with 2GB or RAM, so this is hardly a monster system. We've seen it and heard it from a few sources, but it looks like two R680s, Radeon 3870 X2 will score just over 20,000 in 3Dmark06. It is quite good scaling and it looks like a great score for a non-overclocked system. It will be interesting to see it performing in all games, but that is another matter altogether. The cards are scheduled for introduction at the end of January, but the final driver for four chips will be later in Q1. It looks like the real deal and the drivers are reporting PCI Express 2.0 x8, which should be correct for each of the GPUs, as they're sharing a x16 slot. The card has 1GB of GDDR4 memory, but there was no screen shot of any clock speeds. However, the author of the post claims the GPU's are clocked at 770MHz with the memory at 2,250MHz. We said this back in 2007, but let us be clear on one thing. Nvidia’s upcoming high-end sandwich board, Geforce 9800 GX2, is going to end up faster than a single Radeon 3870 GX2. This comes as no surprise, as Nvidia’s single G92 is faster than a single RV670, and in the same matter a dual chip Nvidia beats ATI. Radeon 3870 X2 will be very competitive, as its single chip brother is still a bit slower compared to Nvidia. We still believe that Radeon 3870 X2 will have quite good sales, as it will be significantly cooler than Nvidia’s card and it will be available in massive numbers.
    EDIT (Jan 17th): We have confirmed that R680 dual chip RV670 will launch on 23rd of January, together with Radeon 3670 / 3650 and 3450 cards.
    EDIT (Jan 23rd): ATI fixed the price of R680 dual chip card to just above €400 and retailers should be selling them for €410 while etailers should offer them for up to €430.
    Since Jan 23rd is here, we have seen launch of 3870 X2, 3670, 3650, 3470, 3450; we have already come to know 3870/3850 cards; and we have few rumors about variations on some of those cards (3690), but pretty much it's all out now. Next step is R700/RV770...
    EDIT (Jan 30th): Well, I'm here again, just wanted to add few links (see below) about few new water-cooled 3870 X2 which look REAL nice (especially CoolIT's water block :) ), info about new DDR4 versions of 3800 X2 coming soon as well, and finally PowerColor's new X2 card which has 4xDVI and on a smaller card, with smaller and lighter (non-reference) cooler, and increased clocks even! So enjoy, links are below with todays date, like I've said :)
    EDIT (Feb 7th): Just added link to story about Vmod of X3870 X2, a link to pictures of Sapphire watercooled card, link to note about cards being on sale for as low as 360€. All links below, with Feb 7th date..

    EDIT (March 24th): My last update here. Just wanted to point to the rumors that updated 3870 cards should be close, both for single and dual (X2) configurations, as some new tweaked chips are prepared. This is similar to nVidia re-releasing 8800 GT/GTS as 9800 GT/GTX with a bit tweaked chip, but it is believed that AMD (ATi) won't change names (again) like nVidia did, as they've done it already when jumping from HD2xxx to current HD3xxx series. These new cards will be based on new A12 revision of RV670 chip. And there are few more tweaks that will apply to X2 cards, as new PCI-e 2.0 bridge chip and probably faster GDDR4 memory. If only they could fix AA/AF problems in these chips..

    nVidia Geforce 9800 GX2

    A few independent sources have confirmed that D9E, Nvidia's sandwich board, will officially launch as Geforce 9800 GX2. The add-in board's partners got the final okay on the name, so they can now proceed on designing their own boxes and printing.There is no way back from here. A few sources also independently confirmed that the board should launch by mid-February time. Geforce 9800 GX2 will have a massive cooler in-between two PCBs. The cooler itself will have a two copper parts that will fit on the GPUs and it will be placed in the middle. The board needs two power connectors, one 3x2 and one 4x2, and it will need about 200 Watts. It will run very hot, but we are sure it will be stable. In the end the performance matters, and this will be fastest thing around.
    EDIT (Jan 17th): Geforce 9800 GX2 dual G92 dual chip sandwich design will end up as expensive as 8800 Ultra, if not even more. The price is not final, but it looks like an expensive piece of marchitecture. You are talking about two 8800 GTS boards glued together, along with an expensive cooler, and of course, Nvidia wants to get some profits out of it. You should be looking at $600 and probably even more for such a card. (I have to agree here, if only by taking current 8800GTS price of roughly 350$, few trims here and there, and you can't go below 600$...)
    EDIT (Jan 28th): According to some photos that popped up on Chiphell, it looks like 9800 GX2 and 8800 GTS 512MB are siblings, but there will be some differences as well, as GTS apparently uses G92-400-A2 chip, while GX2 has G92-450-A2's onboard (see link below for pictures). Differences in chips are yet unknown.
    EDIT (Jan 30th): A few sources have indicated that Geforce 9800 GX2 dual G92 board, codenamed G9E, has been delayed until after the 21st of February. (Note that 9600 cards will be postponed till the same date! Links below, as usual)
    EDIT (Feb 7th): Some of Nvidia partners have said that they will be ready to showcase Nvidia's Geforce 9800 cards at Cebit. So, the launch will be either at Cebit or shortly before Cebit. Cebit starts on March 4th.
    We've got our hands on a very interesting piece of information about the upcoming GeForce 9800GX2 card and it looks this these cards will run hot enough to prove to be dangerous if you touch them while in use.
    Each of the PCB's seem to feature 1GB of memory on this specific card. Now we can't be 100 percent sure that this is the case, as it could simply correlate to the total ammount of memory on the card, but comparing other manuals from the same manufacturer seems to imply that this card might very well come with 2GB of graphics memory.
    EDIT (Feb 18th): The GPUs will be clocked at 600MHz, that's 50MHz slower than the 8800 GTS, or the same as the 8800 GT. The Shaders will apparently be clocked at 1,500MHz, again slower than the 8800 GTS which has its Shaders clocked to 1,625MHz.
    The memory clock is somewhat higher at 1GHz or 2GHz effectivley for the GDDR3 chips, but this is a mere 60MHz faster than a stock clocked 8800 GTS and is unlikely to make a huge difference
    (Btw, rumors are that launch is postponed - again; probably until end of March)

    EDIT (March 24th): This card is out, so go googling for the reviews.. There are even few early quad-SLI articles.. I'll just confirm that above rumors were right, except clocks were tweaked a bit, not much, but they were.. and partners will OC the cards after all. Good work nVidia, for having this hot card overclockable enough so that partners can do it and sell it as a factory OCed cards :)

    nVidia GT200 (ex G100) chip and cards

    D8E is Geforce 9800GX2, and that is already a done deal, but after that comes a new high-end card. We know that this product is expected in the middle of this year and that Nvidia is working on it. Is it G100? The new codename is GT200. We've learned that the next generation Nvidia is going to have more than a billion transistors. 45nm simply won’t be possible this year, and as far as we know GT200 will be 55nm or, in worst case, 65nm. We have received mixed information on this particular matter. Nvidia already has plans to transition to 55nm in 2008, as this half node means smaller and cooler chips. We are probably talking about second half of 2008, but Nvidia is already talking to TSMC about going to this process. It will be an interesting chip to compete with and it is scheduled for the second half of the year. It will definitely be significantly bigger than R700, but only when you understand that R700 is two, rather than one, chip. In this early stage, we've learned that even in the next generation Nvidia doesn’t plan to support DirectX 10.1 API. Nvidia wants to continue its DirectX 10 path, and there's a good chance that it will simply migrate to DirectX 11 before it supports DirectX 10.1. As Nvidia has a dominant position in game development and in the publishing community it doesn’t look that DirectX 10.1 has a lot of chances in 2008, but ATI will certainly push a title or a few that will have full support for DirectX 10.1.
    UPDATE (Feb 1st): We've learned that Nvidia's real next generation chip, codenamed GT200, is a 65nm chip. It sounds like it will be rather hot, as last time we reported about it we learned that it will have more than a billion transistors. We also know that the GT200 is going to be hotter than the 9800GX2 dual chip card with two G92’s inside and that is quite a challenge.
    UPDATE (Feb 7th): Such a card will have a thermal design power of 250W, which is even more than the R600. The thermal design power (TDP) number is usually the worst possible scenario and we know that the R600 had a dual slot cooler and Nvidia doesn’t have any choice but to do the same. GT200’s TDP is 250W it will need two power connectors, but this is nothing unusual as we’ve seen this with R600, R680 and Geforce 9800 GX2 dual chip will have the same.

    UPDATE (March 24th): Not much news here, even though a lot of time had passed.. Probably just because everyone talk about new 9800 GT/GTX/GX2 cards - so don't worry, new things will come by inevitably :) Once there are more news, you can even expect a new roadmap-article; but I'll try to keep it bounded to GT200 only :D

    AMD (ATi) R700/RV770 cards/chips

    ATI's next generation high-end R700 will be made of two RV770 chips. It will be the successor of the R680 (note: 2x RV670) concept and we are looking at two chips on the same card. This product should come in Q2, probably later than sooner. RV770 is naturally the DirectX 10.1 successor of the very successful RV670, the chip that gave Nvidia so many headaches, and RV770 looks like an even bigger trouble maker.
    UPDATE (Jan 15th): RV770 is taped out and it looks very promising. This chip will be used for mainstream, performance and high end products and we can tell you that it should end up significantly faster than RV670. From what we have learned, it should be more than fifty percent faster, although we heard even higher numbers. It is made at 55 nanometre. This baby is scheduled for late Q2 if not early Q3.
    UPDATE (Feb 7th): It looks as if ATI might be the first company to embrace DDR5 memory. GDDR5 obviously offers better memory bandwidth, and traditionally new memory is faster and cooler than the previous generation.
    We've learned that ATI's next generation performance chip codenamed RV770 performs much better than its RV670 predecessor. Our sources used the words „significantly faster than RV670“ and other independent sources have said that chip will be more than fifty percent faster than the existing generation.
    RV770 is a 55 nanometre chip and if all goes superb it will launch around Computex time (early June) but the final silicon are out and they work well. It still has to take a few months from the first silicon to the final production chip but it’s good to know that the chip looks good now.
    UPDATE (Feb 12th): ATI's new flagship performance and high-end chips will have the ability to use GDDR5 memory. GDDR5 promises some crazy frequencies all the way up to 2.5GHz / 5GHz effectively, which is more than two times faster with what you can achieve today with GDDR4.

    UPDATE (March 24th): Not much here either, except ATi marketing slides claiming 2x performance over RV670 for a single RV770 card, though probably only at top resolutions and with AA/AF (which is bugged in current cards anyway). And that's it - so far. But there will be much more news once this wave of nVidia/ATi refresh cards is past us, everyone is just too busy writing about cards that had just came out or will be out in a week or two, so be patient ;)

    AMD (ATi) RV740 mainstream cards/chips

    RV740 is ATI's new mainstream card, and from what we know, it is scheduled for the second half of 2008. The new card is planned as ATI's ultimate mainstream, and this is what ATI needs to compete with the soon-to-be-launched G94 based 9600GT.
    The new RV740 also brings a 256-bit memory interface and it is a 55 nanometer-based chip made my TSMC. The 256-bit memory will move this mainstream card to the next level and will certainly mean that you will be able to set higher settings such as FSAA and Aniso.
    We also know that it will be drastically faster than RV630 and RV635, but we wouldn’t expect anything less than that. Currently it looks like Nvidia will have a massive lead with its 9600GT, as the card is supposed to launch withing the next 10 days, while ATI's chip is scheduled for second half of 2008, probably in the summertime.

    EDIT (March 24th): I haven't had time to update this before, but there aren't much news anyway. You can just add few more codenames to low-mid ranges, starting from lowest RV710, through RV730, to already known RV740. You can click here to read the article.

    Links (by date of publishing, all but one by Fudzilla):

  •